Disturbing Hegemonic Discourse: Nonbinary Gender and Sexual Orientation Labeling on Tumblr6
Labeling concept
There clearly was human anatomy of literary works in therapy referred to as labeling theory and modified labeling concept (Norris, 2011). Predominantly, this literary works is targeted on the negative impacts of labels such as “depressed” and “ex-convict” attached with people considered by culture to be deviant (Norris, 2011). Offered these centers around labeling, drawing connections between labeling theory or modified labeling theory and sex labeling practices could be tricky—the implication that a nonbinary sex or sexual orientation label is indicative of either psychological disease or unlawful tendencies, especially when the legitimacy of sex identification disorder happens to be called into concern by scholars such as for example Judith Butler (2004), isn't the goal of this research. Helpfully, R. Norris’ (2011) study examines self-labeling in nontraditional undergraduates (those aged 25 years and older), as opposed to concentrating on more socially stigmatizing labels of ex-convict or mentally sick dawn. One main point of huge difference, though, is the fact that Norris (2011) discovers negative self-evaluation and later disidentification to be closely tied up with self-labeling (p. 191), whereas NBG&SO self-labeling techniques as talked about in this essay are, eventually, a constructive process, for instance, the entire process of public NBG&SO self-labeling helps offer spaces for communities in order to connect.